PHPincludes/includedGossRudd-MellifontMafiaLegacyCorruptCourtsJusticeQueenslandAustralia.php
"Goss-Rudd-Mellifont
Mafia" => Legacy of Corrupt Courts & Justice in Qld &
Australia
The CMC 'Polices' the hierarchy of the"Goss-Rudd-Mellifont
Mafia" & enforces strict adherence to the corrupt line. The CMC also has the role to keeping
the hierarchy of the corrupt "Goss-Rudd-Mellifont
Mafia" in
line. One needs only consider the Merri
Rose Case and the Gordon Nuttall
case [ Just Google for
"Gordon Nuttall"]. In both of those cases, the CMC was
central. The purpose was to 'keep the corrupt "Goss-Rudd-Mellifont
Mafia" in line.
Corrupt labor has been the government of Queensland for the whole time
, [apart from two years], since the Wayne Goss assumption of Premier
power on 7 December, 1989. As a result, all judges, magistrates,
and Commissioners appointed by labor, are likely to be corrupt, to the
extent of 'raising a reasonable apprehension of bias'.
It is reasonably logical to conclude, that the persons appointed by a
corrupt government to be judges and magistrates who could cause
problems for that corrupt government, are, themselves, likely to be
corrupt. Of course, the CMC fill the role of ensuring that those
on the corrupt side behave 'properly', and not jeopardize the corrupt
hierarchy. Here, consider
the Merri
Rose Caseand the Gordon Nuttall case [ Just Google
for
"Gordon Nuttall"].
Why would a corrupt government appoint honest and honourable
individuals who could expose their corruption so terminating
them? Of course, they would appoint individuals upon whom they
could rely to permit the government to remain corrupt.
What this means is that in Queensland at present, almost all, if not in
fact all, magistrates, judges and Tribunal Decision makers appointed by
this corrupt labor government, are likely to be corrupt, to the
applicable level required by the test of 'apprehended bias' by that
judge, magistrate or tribunal decision make. The 'Burden' or
'Onus' of Proof required for that 'reasonable apprehension of bias' is of
equivalent level to the onus of 'raised on the evidence' or the quantum
of 'reasonable doubt' that would negate a guilty criminal
verdict. These are equivalent to the burden of quantum of
evidence to form a prima facie
case.
The consequence of this is that in Queensland, it would be nigh on
impossible to find a judge or magistrate to try an 'anti-corruption
activist'. The prima facie case against the Goss government and
cabinet, the CJC/CMC that cleared them by stating a false principle of
criminal law, and all labor governments in the same mold as Goss, is
such that that 'reasonable apprehension of bias passes to all of their
appointments.
To extend this explanation: A judge cannot consider a case if he/she is
biased. The test of whether a judge is biased is that a
"reasonably informed bystander" would have a "reasonable apprehension
of bias" by the judge towards the "defendant". The "Burden
of Proof" for a
"reasonable apprehension of bias" by the judge towards the "defendant"
would be that such an apprehension would be "raised on the evidence"or
that a prima facie case for
its existence, existed.
Because a prima fascie case exists that Goss and his cabinet committed
a criminal offence of destroying the Heiner documents, it is factual
that the CJC/CMC approved that crime, accepting that the factual
situation occurred, but the CJC applied a bogus "principle of law" to
the facts. This is more than a prima fascie case that the CJC/CMC
is corrupt. The CJC/CMC could have at any time corrected its
published opinion, but has not. Every labor government of
Queensland since has applauded the CMC. This includes Anna
Bligh's recent statements, in August, 2009. This is more
than a prima facie case that every labor government is corrupt since
and including Goss. This includes Kevin Rudd.
Considering the appointment of judges and magistrates and tribunal
decision makers: It is undoubted that that a "reasonably informed bystander"
would have a "reasonable apprehension" that any judge, magistrates or tribunal decision
maker, appointed by a corrupt government, would themselves, individually, be
corrupt. Such a "corrupt"judge, magistrates or tribunal
decision maker, would be biased against any "anti-corruption activist".
Perchance there was still, on the "bench"a judge,
magistrates or tribunal decision maker, who was appointed by the other
side of politics in Queensland, in the two year period over a decade
ago, in the time since Goss, when labor was out of office, it may be
alleged that such a judge,
magistrates or tribunal decision maker, would not be biased.
With an understanding of organizational dynamics, such a judge,
magistrates or tribunal decision maker, would be subjected to many
covert treatments to have them leave office so that another labor fraud
could be appointed. If they did not leave, it would be reasonable
to expect that they had "joined the corrupt labor camp".
Themes of Websites
for theHAIG REPORT:Group
of Websites:
[We
expect, in
time, to have all of the thousands of pages on theHAIG REPORT:group
of
websites accessible from this Menu of THEMES. Eventually, there will
be 20 themes, each with an average of 15 to 20
websites/domains/directories, with each website/domain having an
average of 20 pages. This would equate to 20
x (15 to 20) x 20 = 6,000 to
8,000 pages. This menu of Themes will be included near the bottom
of
each page, in time. With one line of code, strategically placed, this
Menu of Themes is now on thousands of pages. We are continually and
progressively adding pages to this Menu of Themes of website Menus.]
commonheader.php
Reg.
Office: 254
Hawken Drive, St Lucia, Qld. 4067, Australia.
Editor-in-Chief: Russell G H Mathews BCom BSc
LLB BA EMAIL us anytime:using
Wayne
Goss 
using
PODCAST